Zoo 2: Animal Park vs Minecraft: Play with Friends!
Revenue, downloads, ratings and category context for two iOS apps. Figures are estimates and should be read as ranges, not exact totals.
Zoo 2: Animal ParkUpjers GmbH - Games
Minecraft: Play with Friends!Mojang - Games| Metric | Zoo 2: Animal Park | Minecraft: Play with Friends! | Readout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated revenue / mo | $*** - opens with trial | ~$8.0M | Minecraft: Play with Friends! |
| Revenue band | $*** - opens with trial | $8.0M (point est.) | Use range + confidence |
| Estimated downloads / mo | $*** - opens with trial | ~468k | Minecraft: Play with Friends! |
| Download band | $*** - opens with trial | 468k (point est.) | Use range + confidence |
| Rating | - | 4.51 | Minecraft: Play with Friends! |
| Rating count | - | 825k | Minecraft: Play with Friends! |
| Tracked keywords | — | — | Tie |
| Category | Games | Games | Same market |
Which app is bigger?
Zoo 2: Animal Park and Minecraft: Play with Friends! are compared inside Games with monthly revenue, downloads, rating, review volume, keyword footprint, category placement and range context. Minecraft: Play with Friends! leads on monthly downloads in the current readout, and Minecraft: Play with Friends! wins the revenue readout (the exact figures open with the paid plan), Minecraft: Play with Friends! wins demand, Minecraft: Play with Friends! has deeper review volume, and Tie has the larger tracked keyword footprint. The better app depends on the job: choose the revenue leader when you need monetization proof, choose the download leader when reach matters, and choose the higher-rated or deeper-reviewed app when market trust is the constraint. Read both ranges rather than only the midpoint, then open the category hub and related collections to see whether this pair is an outlier or a normal category pattern.