Yerevan City vs Guppy: Collector Copilot
Revenue, downloads, ratings and category context for two iOS apps. Figures are estimates and should be read as ranges, not exact totals.
Yerevan CityYerevan City LLC - Shopping
Guppy: Collector CopilotDropKit, Inc. - Shopping| Metric | Yerevan City | Guppy: Collector Copilot | Readout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated revenue / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Partial signal |
| Revenue band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Estimated downloads / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Yerevan City |
| Download band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Rating | - | 4.50 | Guppy: Collector Copilot |
| Rating count | - | 189 | Guppy: Collector Copilot |
| Tracked keywords | — | — | Tie |
| Category | Shopping | Shopping | Same market |
Which app is bigger?
Yerevan City and Guppy: Collector Copilot are compared inside Shopping with monthly revenue, downloads, rating, review volume, keyword footprint, category placement and range context. Yerevan City leads on monthly downloads in the current readout, while a clean revenue readout is available only for Guppy: Collector Copilot in this pair. Yerevan City wins demand, Guppy: Collector Copilot has deeper review volume, and Tie has the larger tracked keyword footprint. The better app depends on the job: choose the revenue leader when you need monetization proof, choose the download leader when reach matters, and choose the higher-rated or deeper-reviewed app when market trust is the constraint. Read both ranges rather than only the midpoint, then open the category hub and related collections to see whether this pair is an outlier or a normal category pattern.