Wild Adventures Theme Park vs Pocket God
Revenue, downloads, ratings and category context for two iOS apps. Figures are estimates and should be read as ranges, not exact totals.
Wild Adventures Theme ParkHerschend Family Entertainment Corporation - Entertainment
Pocket GodBolt Creative - Entertainment| Metric | Wild Adventures Theme Park | Pocket God | Readout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated revenue / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Partial signal |
| Revenue band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Estimated downloads / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Pocket God |
| Download band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Rating | - | 4.30 | Pocket God |
| Rating count | - | 2.8k | Pocket God |
| Tracked keywords | — | — | Tie |
| Category | Entertainment | Entertainment | Same market |
Which app is bigger?
Wild Adventures Theme Park and Pocket God are compared inside Entertainment with monthly revenue, downloads, rating, review volume, keyword footprint, category placement and range context. Pocket God leads on monthly downloads in the current readout, while a clean revenue readout is available only for Pocket God in this pair. Pocket God wins demand, Pocket God has deeper review volume, and Tie has the larger tracked keyword footprint. The better app depends on the job: choose the revenue leader when you need monetization proof, choose the download leader when reach matters, and choose the higher-rated or deeper-reviewed app when market trust is the constraint. Read both ranges rather than only the midpoint, then open the category hub and related collections to see whether this pair is an outlier or a normal category pattern.