Weight Loss Tracker + vs Fitia: Contador de CalorĂas
Revenue, downloads, ratings and category context for two iOS apps. Figures are estimates and should be read as ranges, not exact totals.
Weight Loss Tracker +Francesco Pelanda - Health & Fitness
Fitia: Contador de CalorĂasNutrition Technologies - Health & Fitness| Metric | Weight Loss Tracker + | Fitia: Contador de CalorĂas | Readout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated revenue / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Fitia: Contador de CalorĂas |
| Revenue band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Estimated downloads / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Fitia: Contador de CalorĂas |
| Download band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Rating | - | - | Tie |
| Rating count | - | - | Tie |
| Tracked keywords | — | — | Tie |
| Category | Health & Fitness | Health & Fitness | Same market |
Which app is bigger?
Weight Loss Tracker + and Fitia: Contador de CalorĂas are compared inside Health & Fitness with monthly revenue, downloads, rating, review volume, keyword footprint, category placement and range context. Fitia: Contador de CalorĂas leads on monthly downloads in the current readout, and Fitia: Contador de CalorĂas wins the revenue readout (the exact figures open with the paid plan), Fitia: Contador de CalorĂas wins demand, Tie has deeper review volume, and Tie has the larger tracked keyword footprint. The better app depends on the job: choose the revenue leader when you need monetization proof, choose the download leader when reach matters, and choose the higher-rated or deeper-reviewed app when market trust is the constraint. Read both ranges rather than only the midpoint, then open the category hub and related collections to see whether this pair is an outlier or a normal category pattern.