WAVE 3 Louisville Weather vs Michigan Storm Chasers
Revenue, downloads, ratings and category context for two iOS apps. Figures are estimates and should be read as ranges, not exact totals.
WAVE 3 Louisville WeatherGray Television Group, Inc. - Weather
Michigan Storm ChasersMichigan Storm Chasers L.L.C. - Weather| Metric | WAVE 3 Louisville Weather | Michigan Storm Chasers | Readout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated revenue / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Partial signal |
| Revenue band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Estimated downloads / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Michigan Storm Chasers |
| Download band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Rating | - | 4.97 | Michigan Storm Chasers |
| Rating count | - | 542 | Michigan Storm Chasers |
| Tracked keywords | — | — | Tie |
| Category | Weather | Weather | Same market |
Which app is bigger?
WAVE 3 Louisville Weather and Michigan Storm Chasers are compared inside Weather with monthly revenue, downloads, rating, review volume, keyword footprint, category placement and range context. Michigan Storm Chasers leads on monthly downloads in the current readout, while a clean revenue readout is available only for Michigan Storm Chasers in this pair. Michigan Storm Chasers wins demand, Michigan Storm Chasers has deeper review volume, and Tie has the larger tracked keyword footprint. The better app depends on the job: choose the revenue leader when you need monetization proof, choose the download leader when reach matters, and choose the higher-rated or deeper-reviewed app when market trust is the constraint. Read both ranges rather than only the midpoint, then open the category hub and related collections to see whether this pair is an outlier or a normal category pattern.