Washington Post vs Hourly Newsy
Revenue, downloads, ratings and category context for two iOS apps. Figures are estimates and should be read as ranges, not exact totals.
| Metric | Washington Post | Hourly Newsy | Readout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated revenue / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Washington Post |
| Revenue band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Estimated downloads / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Washington Post |
| Download band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Rating | 4.73 | 5.00 | Hourly Newsy |
| Rating count | 632k | 1 | Washington Post |
| Tracked keywords | 1 | — | Washington Post |
| Category | News | News | Same market |
Which app is bigger?
Washington Post and Hourly Newsy are compared inside News with monthly revenue, downloads, rating, review volume, keyword footprint, category placement and range context. Washington Post leads on monthly downloads in the current readout, and Washington Post wins the revenue readout (the exact figures open with the paid plan), Washington Post wins demand, Washington Post has deeper review volume, and Washington Post has the larger tracked keyword footprint. The better app depends on the job: choose the revenue leader when you need monetization proof, choose the download leader when reach matters, and choose the higher-rated or deeper-reviewed app when market trust is the constraint. Read both ranges rather than only the midpoint, then open the category hub and related collections to see whether this pair is an outlier or a normal category pattern.