Trip.com: Book Flights, Hotels vs Ethiopian Airlines
Revenue, downloads, ratings and category context for two iOS apps. Figures are estimates and should be read as ranges, not exact totals.
Trip.com: Book Flights, HotelsTrip.com Travel Singapore Pte. Ltd. - Travel
Ethiopian AirlinesEthiopian Airlines - Travel| Metric | Trip.com: Book Flights, Hotels | Ethiopian Airlines | Readout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated revenue / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Partial signal |
| Revenue band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Estimated downloads / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Trip.com: Book Flights, Hotels |
| Download band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Rating | 4.62 | - | Trip.com: Book Flights, Hotels |
| Rating count | 37k | - | Trip.com: Book Flights, Hotels |
| Tracked keywords | 2 | — | Trip.com: Book Flights, Hotels |
| Category | Travel | Travel | Same market |
Which app is bigger?
Trip.com: Book Flights, Hotels and Ethiopian Airlines are compared inside Travel with monthly revenue, downloads, rating, review volume, keyword footprint, category placement and range context. Trip.com: Book Flights, Hotels leads on monthly downloads in the current readout, while a clean revenue readout is available only for neither app in this pair. Trip.com: Book Flights, Hotels wins demand, Trip.com: Book Flights, Hotels has deeper review volume, and Trip.com: Book Flights, Hotels has the larger tracked keyword footprint. The better app depends on the job: choose the revenue leader when you need monetization proof, choose the download leader when reach matters, and choose the higher-rated or deeper-reviewed app when market trust is the constraint. Read both ranges rather than only the midpoint, then open the category hub and related collections to see whether this pair is an outlier or a normal category pattern.