Tree of Savior: NEO vs Smash Fest!
Revenue, downloads, ratings and category context for two iOS apps. Figures are estimates and should be read as ranges, not exact totals.
Tree of Savior: NEONEOCRAFT LIMITED - Games
Smash Fest!Flow Games Bilisim Yazilim ve Pazarlama Anonim Sirketi - Games| Metric | Tree of Savior: NEO | Smash Fest! | Readout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated revenue / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Smash Fest! |
| Revenue band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Estimated downloads / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Smash Fest! |
| Download band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Rating | - | 4.73 | Smash Fest! |
| Rating count | - | 216k | Smash Fest! |
| Tracked keywords | — | — | Tie |
| Category | Games | Games | Same market |
Which app is bigger?
Tree of Savior: NEO and Smash Fest! are compared inside Games with monthly revenue, downloads, rating, review volume, keyword footprint, category placement and range context. Smash Fest! leads on monthly downloads in the current readout, and Smash Fest! wins the revenue readout (the exact figures open with the paid plan), Smash Fest! wins demand, Smash Fest! has deeper review volume, and Tie has the larger tracked keyword footprint. The better app depends on the job: choose the revenue leader when you need monetization proof, choose the download leader when reach matters, and choose the higher-rated or deeper-reviewed app when market trust is the constraint. Read both ranges rather than only the midpoint, then open the category hub and related collections to see whether this pair is an outlier or a normal category pattern.