Trailforks: Offline Bike Maps vs MilGPS
Revenue, downloads, ratings and category context for two iOS apps. Figures are estimates and should be read as ranges, not exact totals.
Trailforks: Offline Bike MapsPinkbike.com - Navigation
MilGPSCascode Labs Pty Ltd - Navigation| Metric | Trailforks: Offline Bike Maps | MilGPS | Readout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated revenue / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Trailforks: Offline Bike Maps |
| Revenue band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Estimated downloads / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Trailforks: Offline Bike Maps |
| Download band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Rating | 4.72 | 4.83 | MilGPS |
| Rating count | 16k | 5.5k | Trailforks: Offline Bike Maps |
| Tracked keywords | — | — | Tie |
| Category | Navigation | Navigation | Same market |
Which app is bigger?
Trailforks: Offline Bike Maps and MilGPS are compared inside Navigation with monthly revenue, downloads, rating, review volume, keyword footprint, category placement and range context. Trailforks: Offline Bike Maps leads on monthly downloads in the current readout, and Trailforks: Offline Bike Maps wins the revenue readout (the exact figures open with the paid plan), Trailforks: Offline Bike Maps wins demand, Trailforks: Offline Bike Maps has deeper review volume, and Tie has the larger tracked keyword footprint. The better app depends on the job: choose the revenue leader when you need monetization proof, choose the download leader when reach matters, and choose the higher-rated or deeper-reviewed app when market trust is the constraint. Read both ranges rather than only the midpoint, then open the category hub and related collections to see whether this pair is an outlier or a normal category pattern.