TradingView: Track All Markets vs Webull: Investing & Trading
Revenue, downloads, ratings and category context for two iOS apps. Figures are estimates and should be read as ranges, not exact totals.
TradingView: Track All MarketsTradingView - Finance
Webull: Investing & TradingWebull Technologies Pte. Ltd. - Finance| Metric | TradingView: Track All Markets | Webull: Investing & Trading | Readout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated revenue / mo | $*** - opens with trial | ~$80k | TradingView: Track All Markets |
| Revenue band | $*** - opens with trial | $80k (point est.) | Use range + confidence |
| Estimated downloads / mo | $*** - opens with trial | ~296k | TradingView: Track All Markets |
| Download band | $*** - opens with trial | 296k (point est.) | Use range + confidence |
| Rating | 4.84 | 4.70 | TradingView: Track All Markets |
| Rating count | 398k | 338k | TradingView: Track All Markets |
| Tracked keywords | 3 | 1 | TradingView: Track All Markets |
| Category | Finance | Finance | Same market |
Which app is bigger?
TradingView: Track All Markets and Webull: Investing & Trading are compared inside Finance with monthly revenue, downloads, rating, review volume, keyword footprint, category placement and range context. TradingView: Track All Markets leads on monthly downloads in the current readout, and TradingView: Track All Markets wins the revenue readout (the exact figures open with the paid plan), TradingView: Track All Markets wins demand, TradingView: Track All Markets has deeper review volume, and TradingView: Track All Markets has the larger tracked keyword footprint. The better app depends on the job: choose the revenue leader when you need monetization proof, choose the download leader when reach matters, and choose the higher-rated or deeper-reviewed app when market trust is the constraint. Read both ranges rather than only the midpoint, then open the category hub and related collections to see whether this pair is an outlier or a normal category pattern.