Track it: Packages & Deals vs FSD Hunter
Revenue, downloads, ratings and category context for two iOS apps. Figures are estimates and should be read as ranges, not exact totals.
Track it: Packages & DealsAymen Tiar - Shopping
FSD HunterDavid Hugenberg - Shopping| Metric | Track it: Packages & Deals | FSD Hunter | Readout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated revenue / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Track it: Packages & Deals |
| Revenue band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Estimated downloads / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Track it: Packages & Deals |
| Download band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Rating | - | 4.33 | FSD Hunter |
| Rating count | - | 64 | FSD Hunter |
| Tracked keywords | — | — | Tie |
| Category | Shopping | Shopping | Same market |
Which app is bigger?
Track it: Packages & Deals and FSD Hunter are compared inside Shopping with monthly revenue, downloads, rating, review volume, keyword footprint, category placement and range context. Track it: Packages & Deals leads on monthly downloads in the current readout, and Track it: Packages & Deals wins the revenue readout (the exact figures open with the paid plan), Track it: Packages & Deals wins demand, FSD Hunter has deeper review volume, and Tie has the larger tracked keyword footprint. The better app depends on the job: choose the revenue leader when you need monetization proof, choose the download leader when reach matters, and choose the higher-rated or deeper-reviewed app when market trust is the constraint. Read both ranges rather than only the midpoint, then open the category hub and related collections to see whether this pair is an outlier or a normal category pattern.