Too Good To Go: Save Good Food vs ReciMe: Recipes & Meal Planner
Revenue, downloads, ratings and category context for two iOS apps. Figures are estimates and should be read as ranges, not exact totals.
| Metric | Too Good To Go: Save Good Food | ReciMe: Recipes & Meal Planner | Readout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated revenue / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Partial signal |
| Revenue band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Estimated downloads / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Too Good To Go: Save Good Food |
| Download band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Rating | 4.93 | 4.80 | Too Good To Go: Save Good Food |
| Rating count | 546k | 264k | Too Good To Go: Save Good Food |
| Tracked keywords | — | 1 | ReciMe: Recipes & Meal Planner |
| Category | Food & Drink | Food & Drink | Same market |
Which app is bigger?
Too Good To Go: Save Good Food and ReciMe: Recipes & Meal Planner are compared inside Food & Drink with monthly revenue, downloads, rating, review volume, keyword footprint, category placement and range context. Too Good To Go: Save Good Food leads on monthly downloads in the current readout, while a clean revenue readout is available only for ReciMe: Recipes & Meal Planner in this pair. Too Good To Go: Save Good Food wins demand, Too Good To Go: Save Good Food has deeper review volume, and ReciMe: Recipes & Meal Planner has the larger tracked keyword footprint. The better app depends on the job: choose the revenue leader when you need monetization proof, choose the download leader when reach matters, and choose the higher-rated or deeper-reviewed app when market trust is the constraint. Read both ranges rather than only the midpoint, then open the category hub and related collections to see whether this pair is an outlier or a normal category pattern.