Tonic: Earn Screen Time vs Things 3
Revenue, downloads, ratings and category context for two iOS apps. Figures are estimates and should be read as ranges, not exact totals.
Tonic: Earn Screen TimeSets Studio LLC - Productivity
Things 3Cultured Code GmbH & Co. KG - Productivity| Metric | Tonic: Earn Screen Time | Things 3 | Readout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated revenue / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Tonic: Earn Screen Time |
| Revenue band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Estimated downloads / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Tonic: Earn Screen Time |
| Download band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Rating | - | 4.82 | Things 3 |
| Rating count | - | 28k | Things 3 |
| Tracked keywords | — | — | Tie |
| Category | Productivity | Productivity | Same market |
Which app is bigger?
Tonic: Earn Screen Time and Things 3 are compared inside Productivity with monthly revenue, downloads, rating, review volume, keyword footprint, category placement and range context. Tonic: Earn Screen Time leads on monthly downloads in the current readout, and Tonic: Earn Screen Time wins the revenue readout (the exact figures open with the paid plan), Tonic: Earn Screen Time wins demand, Things 3 has deeper review volume, and Tie has the larger tracked keyword footprint. The better app depends on the job: choose the revenue leader when you need monetization proof, choose the download leader when reach matters, and choose the higher-rated or deeper-reviewed app when market trust is the constraint. Read both ranges rather than only the midpoint, then open the category hub and related collections to see whether this pair is an outlier or a normal category pattern.