TimeTree: Shared Calendar vs Parchment: Agenda & Daily Note
Revenue, downloads, ratings and category context for two iOS apps. Figures are estimates and should be read as ranges, not exact totals.
TimeTree: Shared CalendarTimeTree, Inc. - Productivity
Parchment: Agenda & Daily NoteChris Lawley - Productivity| Metric | TimeTree: Shared Calendar | Parchment: Agenda & Daily Note | Readout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated revenue / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | TimeTree: Shared Calendar |
| Revenue band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Estimated downloads / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | TimeTree: Shared Calendar |
| Download band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Rating | 4.85 | 4.72 | TimeTree: Shared Calendar |
| Rating count | 88k | 92 | TimeTree: Shared Calendar |
| Tracked keywords | 8 | 1 | TimeTree: Shared Calendar |
| Category | Productivity | Productivity | Same market |
Which app is bigger?
TimeTree: Shared Calendar and Parchment: Agenda & Daily Note are compared inside Productivity with monthly revenue, downloads, rating, review volume, keyword footprint, category placement and range context. TimeTree: Shared Calendar leads on monthly downloads in the current readout, and TimeTree: Shared Calendar wins the revenue readout (the exact figures open with the paid plan), TimeTree: Shared Calendar wins demand, TimeTree: Shared Calendar has deeper review volume, and TimeTree: Shared Calendar has the larger tracked keyword footprint. The better app depends on the job: choose the revenue leader when you need monetization proof, choose the download leader when reach matters, and choose the higher-rated or deeper-reviewed app when market trust is the constraint. Read both ranges rather than only the midpoint, then open the category hub and related collections to see whether this pair is an outlier or a normal category pattern.