TIDAL Music: HiFi Sound vs Qobuz: Music & Editorial
Revenue, downloads, ratings and category context for two iOS apps. Figures are estimates and should be read as ranges, not exact totals.
TIDAL Music: HiFi SoundTIDAL Music AS - Music
Qobuz: Music & EditorialQobuz - Music| Metric | TIDAL Music: HiFi Sound | Qobuz: Music & Editorial | Readout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated revenue / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | TIDAL Music: HiFi Sound |
| Revenue band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Estimated downloads / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | TIDAL Music: HiFi Sound |
| Download band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Rating | 4.71 | 4.62 | TIDAL Music: HiFi Sound |
| Rating count | 245k | 19k | TIDAL Music: HiFi Sound |
| Tracked keywords | 1 | 1 | Tie |
| Category | Music | Music | Same market |
Which app is bigger?
TIDAL Music: HiFi Sound and Qobuz: Music & Editorial are compared inside Music with monthly revenue, downloads, rating, review volume, keyword footprint, category placement and range context. TIDAL Music: HiFi Sound leads on monthly downloads in the current readout, and TIDAL Music: HiFi Sound wins the revenue readout (the exact figures open with the paid plan), TIDAL Music: HiFi Sound wins demand, TIDAL Music: HiFi Sound has deeper review volume, and Tie has the larger tracked keyword footprint. The better app depends on the job: choose the revenue leader when you need monetization proof, choose the download leader when reach matters, and choose the higher-rated or deeper-reviewed app when market trust is the constraint. Read both ranges rather than only the midpoint, then open the category hub and related collections to see whether this pair is an outlier or a normal category pattern.