The San Francisco Chronicle vs GoodLinks
Revenue, downloads, ratings and category context for two iOS apps. Figures are estimates and should be read as ranges, not exact totals.
| Metric | The San Francisco Chronicle | GoodLinks | Readout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated revenue / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | The San Francisco Chronicle |
| Revenue band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Estimated downloads / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | The San Francisco Chronicle |
| Download band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Rating | 4.53 | 4.72 | GoodLinks |
| Rating count | 31k | 629 | The San Francisco Chronicle |
| Tracked keywords | — | — | Tie |
| Category | News | News | Same market |
Which app is bigger?
The San Francisco Chronicle and GoodLinks are compared inside News with monthly revenue, downloads, rating, review volume, keyword footprint, category placement and range context. The San Francisco Chronicle leads on monthly downloads in the current readout, and The San Francisco Chronicle wins the revenue readout (the exact figures open with the paid plan), The San Francisco Chronicle wins demand, The San Francisco Chronicle has deeper review volume, and Tie has the larger tracked keyword footprint. The better app depends on the job: choose the revenue leader when you need monetization proof, choose the download leader when reach matters, and choose the higher-rated or deeper-reviewed app when market trust is the constraint. Read both ranges rather than only the midpoint, then open the category hub and related collections to see whether this pair is an outlier or a normal category pattern.