The Philadelphia Inquirer vs GoodLinks
Revenue, downloads, ratings and category context for two iOS apps. Figures are estimates and should be read as ranges, not exact totals.
The Philadelphia InquirerPhiladelphia Media Network, Inc. - News
GoodLinksNgoc Luu - News| Metric | The Philadelphia Inquirer | GoodLinks | Readout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated revenue / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | The Philadelphia Inquirer |
| Revenue band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Estimated downloads / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | The Philadelphia Inquirer |
| Download band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Rating | 4.60 | 4.72 | GoodLinks |
| Rating count | 18k | 629 | The Philadelphia Inquirer |
| Tracked keywords | — | — | Tie |
| Category | News | News | Same market |
Which app is bigger?
The Philadelphia Inquirer and GoodLinks are compared inside News with monthly revenue, downloads, rating, review volume, keyword footprint, category placement and range context. The Philadelphia Inquirer leads on monthly downloads in the current readout, and The Philadelphia Inquirer wins the revenue readout (the exact figures open with the paid plan), The Philadelphia Inquirer wins demand, The Philadelphia Inquirer has deeper review volume, and Tie has the larger tracked keyword footprint. The better app depends on the job: choose the revenue leader when you need monetization proof, choose the download leader when reach matters, and choose the higher-rated or deeper-reviewed app when market trust is the constraint. Read both ranges rather than only the midpoint, then open the category hub and related collections to see whether this pair is an outlier or a normal category pattern.