The Hot Room 2.0 vs Strava: Run, Bike, Walk
Revenue, downloads, ratings and category context for two iOS apps. Figures are estimates and should be read as ranges, not exact totals.
The Hot Room 2.0Geisler Young - Health & Fitness
Strava: Run, Bike, WalkStrava, Inc. - Health & Fitness| Metric | The Hot Room 2.0 | Strava: Run, Bike, Walk | Readout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated revenue / mo | $*** - opens with trial | ~$16M | Partial signal |
| Revenue band | $*** - opens with trial | $16M (point est.) | Use range + confidence |
| Estimated downloads / mo | $*** - opens with trial | ~3.0M | Strava: Run, Bike, Walk |
| Download band | $*** - opens with trial | 3.0M (point est.) | Use range + confidence |
| Rating | - | 4.81 | Strava: Run, Bike, Walk |
| Rating count | - | 365k | Strava: Run, Bike, Walk |
| Tracked keywords | — | 6 | Strava: Run, Bike, Walk |
| Category | Health & Fitness | Health & Fitness | Same market |
Which app is bigger?
The Hot Room 2.0 and Strava: Run, Bike, Walk are compared inside Health & Fitness with monthly revenue, downloads, rating, review volume, keyword footprint, category placement and range context. Strava: Run, Bike, Walk leads on monthly downloads in the current readout, while a clean revenue readout is available only for Strava: Run, Bike, Walk in this pair. Strava: Run, Bike, Walk wins demand, Strava: Run, Bike, Walk has deeper review volume, and Strava: Run, Bike, Walk has the larger tracked keyword footprint. The better app depends on the job: choose the revenue leader when you need monetization proof, choose the download leader when reach matters, and choose the higher-rated or deeper-reviewed app when market trust is the constraint. Read both ranges rather than only the midpoint, then open the category hub and related collections to see whether this pair is an outlier or a normal category pattern.