The Economist: News & Analysis vs Hourly Newsy
Revenue, downloads, ratings and category context for two iOS apps. Figures are estimates and should be read as ranges, not exact totals.
The Economist: News & AnalysisThe Economist - News
Hourly NewsyMike Lapchick - News| Metric | The Economist: News & Analysis | Hourly Newsy | Readout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated revenue / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | The Economist: News & Analysis |
| Revenue band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Estimated downloads / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | The Economist: News & Analysis |
| Download band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Rating | 4.87 | 5.00 | Hourly Newsy |
| Rating count | 182k | 1 | The Economist: News & Analysis |
| Tracked keywords | 2 | — | The Economist: News & Analysis |
| Category | News | News | Same market |
Which app is bigger?
The Economist: News & Analysis and Hourly Newsy are compared inside News with monthly revenue, downloads, rating, review volume, keyword footprint, category placement and range context. The Economist: News & Analysis leads on monthly downloads in the current readout, and The Economist: News & Analysis wins the revenue readout (the exact figures open with the paid plan), The Economist: News & Analysis wins demand, The Economist: News & Analysis has deeper review volume, and The Economist: News & Analysis has the larger tracked keyword footprint. The better app depends on the job: choose the revenue leader when you need monetization proof, choose the download leader when reach matters, and choose the higher-rated or deeper-reviewed app when market trust is the constraint. Read both ranges rather than only the midpoint, then open the category hub and related collections to see whether this pair is an outlier or a normal category pattern.