Taska: γγγγ¨γͺγΉγ&γγ©γ³γγΌ vs Google Gemini
Revenue, downloads, ratings and category context for two iOS apps. Figures are estimates and should be read as ranges, not exact totals.
Taska: γγγγ¨γͺγΉγ&γγ©γ³γγΌBon Sung Koo - Productivity
Google GeminiGoogle - Productivity| Metric | Taska: γγγγ¨γͺγΉγ&γγ©γ³γγΌ | Google Gemini | Readout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated revenue / mo | $*** - opens with trial | ~$900k | Google Gemini |
| Revenue band | $*** - opens with trial | $900k (point est.) | Use range + confidence |
| Estimated downloads / mo | $*** - opens with trial | ~14.0M | Google Gemini |
| Download band | $*** - opens with trial | 14.0M (point est.) | Use range + confidence |
| Rating | - | 4.72 | Google Gemini |
| Rating count | - | 2.0M | Google Gemini |
| Tracked keywords | β | 15 | Google Gemini |
| Category | Productivity | Productivity | Same market |
Which app is bigger?
Taska: γγγγ¨γͺγΉγ&γγ©γ³γγΌ and Google Gemini are compared inside Productivity with monthly revenue, downloads, rating, review volume, keyword footprint, category placement and range context. Google Gemini leads on monthly downloads in the current readout, and Google Gemini wins the revenue readout (the exact figures open with the paid plan), Google Gemini wins demand, Google Gemini has deeper review volume, and Google Gemini has the larger tracked keyword footprint. The better app depends on the job: choose the revenue leader when you need monetization proof, choose the download leader when reach matters, and choose the higher-rated or deeper-reviewed app when market trust is the constraint. Read both ranges rather than only the midpoint, then open the category hub and related collections to see whether this pair is an outlier or a normal category pattern.