Taller AI: Height Maximizer vs Streaks
Revenue, downloads, ratings and category context for two iOS apps. Figures are estimates and should be read as ranges, not exact totals.
Taller AI: Height MaximizerLeadimize - Health & Fitness
StreaksCrunchy Bagel - Health & Fitness| Metric | Taller AI: Height Maximizer | Streaks | Readout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated revenue / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Streaks |
| Revenue band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Estimated downloads / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Taller AI: Height Maximizer |
| Download band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Rating | - | 4.81 | Streaks |
| Rating count | - | 27k | Streaks |
| Tracked keywords | — | 3 | Streaks |
| Category | Health & Fitness | Health & Fitness | Same market |
Which app is bigger?
Taller AI: Height Maximizer and Streaks are compared inside Health & Fitness with monthly revenue, downloads, rating, review volume, keyword footprint, category placement and range context. Taller AI: Height Maximizer leads on monthly downloads in the current readout, and Streaks wins the revenue readout (the exact figures open with the paid plan), Taller AI: Height Maximizer wins demand, Streaks has deeper review volume, and Streaks has the larger tracked keyword footprint. The better app depends on the job: choose the revenue leader when you need monetization proof, choose the download leader when reach matters, and choose the higher-rated or deeper-reviewed app when market trust is the constraint. Read both ranges rather than only the midpoint, then open the category hub and related collections to see whether this pair is an outlier or a normal category pattern.