SuperVPN Fast VPN Client vs Shadowrocket
Revenue, downloads, ratings and category context for two iOS apps. Figures are estimates and should be read as ranges, not exact totals.
SuperVPN Fast VPN ClientNETWORKSUPER LTD - Utilities
ShadowrocketShadow Launch Technology Limited - Utilities| Metric | SuperVPN Fast VPN Client | Shadowrocket | Readout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated revenue / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Shadowrocket |
| Revenue band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Estimated downloads / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | SuperVPN Fast VPN Client |
| Download band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Rating | - | 4.48 | Shadowrocket |
| Rating count | - | 12k | Shadowrocket |
| Tracked keywords | 1 | — | SuperVPN Fast VPN Client |
| Category | Utilities | Utilities | Same market |
Which app is bigger?
SuperVPN Fast VPN Client and Shadowrocket are compared inside Utilities with monthly revenue, downloads, rating, review volume, keyword footprint, category placement and range context. SuperVPN Fast VPN Client leads on monthly downloads in the current readout, and Shadowrocket wins the revenue readout (the exact figures open with the paid plan), SuperVPN Fast VPN Client wins demand, Shadowrocket has deeper review volume, and SuperVPN Fast VPN Client has the larger tracked keyword footprint. The better app depends on the job: choose the revenue leader when you need monetization proof, choose the download leader when reach matters, and choose the higher-rated or deeper-reviewed app when market trust is the constraint. Read both ranges rather than only the midpoint, then open the category hub and related collections to see whether this pair is an outlier or a normal category pattern.