SNCF Connect: Bahn & Routen vs 乗換路線図
Revenue, downloads, ratings and category context for two iOS apps. Figures are estimates and should be read as ranges, not exact totals.
SNCF Connect: Bahn & RoutenSNCF Connect - Travel
乗換路線図TOKYO STUDIO INC. - Travel| Metric | SNCF Connect: Bahn & Routen | 乗換路線図 | Readout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated revenue / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Partial signal |
| Revenue band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Estimated downloads / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | SNCF Connect: Bahn & Routen |
| Download band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Rating | - | - | Tie |
| Rating count | - | - | Tie |
| Tracked keywords | — | — | Tie |
| Category | Travel | Travel | Same market |
Which app is bigger?
SNCF Connect: Bahn & Routen and 乗換路線図 are compared inside Travel with monthly revenue, downloads, rating, review volume, keyword footprint, category placement and range context. SNCF Connect: Bahn & Routen leads on monthly downloads in the current readout, while a clean revenue readout is available only for 乗換路線図 in this pair. SNCF Connect: Bahn & Routen wins demand, Tie has deeper review volume, and Tie has the larger tracked keyword footprint. The better app depends on the job: choose the revenue leader when you need monetization proof, choose the download leader when reach matters, and choose the higher-rated or deeper-reviewed app when market trust is the constraint. Read both ranges rather than only the midpoint, then open the category hub and related collections to see whether this pair is an outlier or a normal category pattern.