Seattle Times Mobile vs FredScanner Pro
Revenue, downloads, ratings and category context for two iOS apps. Figures are estimates and should be read as ranges, not exact totals.
Seattle Times MobileThe Seattle Times - News
FredScanner ProWaveJam Technologies LLC - News| Metric | Seattle Times Mobile | FredScanner Pro | Readout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated revenue / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Seattle Times Mobile |
| Revenue band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Estimated downloads / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Seattle Times Mobile |
| Download band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Rating | 4.58 | 4.40 | Seattle Times Mobile |
| Rating count | 26k | 10 | Seattle Times Mobile |
| Tracked keywords | — | 1 | FredScanner Pro |
| Category | News | News | Same market |
Which app is bigger?
Seattle Times Mobile and FredScanner Pro are compared inside News with monthly revenue, downloads, rating, review volume, keyword footprint, category placement and range context. Seattle Times Mobile leads on monthly downloads in the current readout, and Seattle Times Mobile wins the revenue readout (the exact figures open with the paid plan), Seattle Times Mobile wins demand, Seattle Times Mobile has deeper review volume, and FredScanner Pro has the larger tracked keyword footprint. The better app depends on the job: choose the revenue leader when you need monetization proof, choose the download leader when reach matters, and choose the higher-rated or deeper-reviewed app when market trust is the constraint. Read both ranges rather than only the midpoint, then open the category hub and related collections to see whether this pair is an outlier or a normal category pattern.