SAP Concur vs UPS
Revenue, downloads, ratings and category context for two iOS apps. Figures are estimates and should be read as ranges, not exact totals.
SAP ConcurConcur - Business
UPSUPS - Business| Metric | SAP Concur | UPS | Readout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated revenue / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Partial signal |
| Revenue band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Estimated downloads / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | SAP Concur |
| Download band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Rating | - | 4.58 | UPS |
| Rating count | - | 1.1M | UPS |
| Tracked keywords | 1 | — | SAP Concur |
| Category | Business | Business | Same market |
Which app is bigger?
SAP Concur and UPS are compared inside Business with monthly revenue, downloads, rating, review volume, keyword footprint, category placement and range context. SAP Concur leads on monthly downloads in the current readout, while a clean revenue readout is available only for neither app in this pair. SAP Concur wins demand, UPS has deeper review volume, and SAP Concur has the larger tracked keyword footprint. The better app depends on the job: choose the revenue leader when you need monetization proof, choose the download leader when reach matters, and choose the higher-rated or deeper-reviewed app when market trust is the constraint. Read both ranges rather than only the midpoint, then open the category hub and related collections to see whether this pair is an outlier or a normal category pattern.