Samsung Galaxy Watch (Gear S) vs Shadowrocket
Revenue, downloads, ratings and category context for two iOS apps. Figures are estimates and should be read as ranges, not exact totals.
Samsung Galaxy Watch (Gear S)Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. - Utilities
ShadowrocketShadow Launch Technology Limited - Utilities| Metric | Samsung Galaxy Watch (Gear S) | Shadowrocket | Readout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated revenue / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Partial signal |
| Revenue band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Estimated downloads / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Samsung Galaxy Watch (Gear S) |
| Download band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Rating | - | 4.48 | Shadowrocket |
| Rating count | - | 12k | Shadowrocket |
| Tracked keywords | — | — | Tie |
| Category | Utilities | Utilities | Same market |
Which app is bigger?
Samsung Galaxy Watch (Gear S) and Shadowrocket are compared inside Utilities with monthly revenue, downloads, rating, review volume, keyword footprint, category placement and range context. Samsung Galaxy Watch (Gear S) leads on monthly downloads in the current readout, while a clean revenue readout is available only for Shadowrocket in this pair. Samsung Galaxy Watch (Gear S) wins demand, Shadowrocket has deeper review volume, and Tie has the larger tracked keyword footprint. The better app depends on the job: choose the revenue leader when you need monetization proof, choose the download leader when reach matters, and choose the higher-rated or deeper-reviewed app when market trust is the constraint. Read both ranges rather than only the midpoint, then open the category hub and related collections to see whether this pair is an outlier or a normal category pattern.