Rosetta Stone Sapphire vs Scholarly - Swipe and Apply
Revenue, downloads, ratings and category context for two iOS apps. Figures are estimates and should be read as ranges, not exact totals.
Rosetta Stone SapphireRosetta Stone, Ltd. - Education
Scholarly - Swipe and ApplyNeedThat Studio LLC - Education| Metric | Rosetta Stone Sapphire | Scholarly - Swipe and Apply | Readout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated revenue / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Rosetta Stone Sapphire |
| Revenue band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Estimated downloads / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Rosetta Stone Sapphire |
| Download band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Rating | - | - | Tie |
| Rating count | - | - | Tie |
| Tracked keywords | — | — | Tie |
| Category | Education | Education | Same market |
Which app is bigger?
Rosetta Stone Sapphire and Scholarly - Swipe and Apply are compared inside Education with monthly revenue, downloads, rating, review volume, keyword footprint, category placement and range context. Rosetta Stone Sapphire leads on monthly downloads in the current readout, and Rosetta Stone Sapphire wins the revenue readout (the exact figures open with the paid plan), Rosetta Stone Sapphire wins demand, Tie has deeper review volume, and Tie has the larger tracked keyword footprint. The better app depends on the job: choose the revenue leader when you need monetization proof, choose the download leader when reach matters, and choose the higher-rated or deeper-reviewed app when market trust is the constraint. Read both ranges rather than only the midpoint, then open the category hub and related collections to see whether this pair is an outlier or a normal category pattern.