Robinhood: Trading & Investing vs Fidelity Investments
Revenue, downloads, ratings and category context for two iOS apps. Figures are estimates and should be read as ranges, not exact totals.
Robinhood: Trading & InvestingRobinhood Markets, Inc. - Finance
Fidelity InvestmentsFidelity Investments - Finance| Metric | Robinhood: Trading & Investing | Fidelity Investments | Readout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated revenue / mo | Not resolved | $*** - opens with trial | Partial signal |
| Revenue band | Not resolved | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Estimated downloads / mo | ~3.4M | $*** - opens with trial | Robinhood: Trading & Investing |
| Download band | 3.4M (point est.) | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Rating | 4.29 | 4.79 | Fidelity Investments |
| Rating count | 4.8M | 3.2M | Robinhood: Trading & Investing |
| Tracked keywords | 3 | 1 | Robinhood: Trading & Investing |
| Category | Finance | Finance | Same market |
Which app is bigger?
Robinhood: Trading & Investing and Fidelity Investments are compared inside Finance with monthly revenue, downloads, rating, review volume, keyword footprint, category placement and range context. Robinhood: Trading & Investing leads on monthly downloads in the current readout, while a clean revenue readout is available only for neither app in this pair. Robinhood: Trading & Investing wins demand, Robinhood: Trading & Investing has deeper review volume, and Robinhood: Trading & Investing has the larger tracked keyword footprint. The better app depends on the job: choose the revenue leader when you need monetization proof, choose the download leader when reach matters, and choose the higher-rated or deeper-reviewed app when market trust is the constraint. Read both ranges rather than only the midpoint, then open the category hub and related collections to see whether this pair is an outlier or a normal category pattern.