Revive: AI Face Photo Animator vs Cricut Design Space
Revenue, downloads, ratings and category context for two iOS apps. Figures are estimates and should be read as ranges, not exact totals.
Revive: AI Face Photo AnimatorRefaceAI Limited - Graphics & Design
Cricut Design SpaceCricut, Inc. - Graphics & Design| Metric | Revive: AI Face Photo Animator | Cricut Design Space | Readout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated revenue / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Cricut Design Space |
| Revenue band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Estimated downloads / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Cricut Design Space |
| Download band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Rating | 4.65 | 4.74 | Cricut Design Space |
| Rating count | 25k | 745k | Cricut Design Space |
| Tracked keywords | 2 | — | Revive: AI Face Photo Animator |
| Category | Graphics & Design | Graphics & Design | Same market |
Which app is bigger?
Revive: AI Face Photo Animator and Cricut Design Space are compared inside Graphics & Design with monthly revenue, downloads, rating, review volume, keyword footprint, category placement and range context. Cricut Design Space leads on monthly downloads in the current readout, and Cricut Design Space wins the revenue readout (the exact figures open with the paid plan), Cricut Design Space wins demand, Cricut Design Space has deeper review volume, and Revive: AI Face Photo Animator has the larger tracked keyword footprint. The better app depends on the job: choose the revenue leader when you need monetization proof, choose the download leader when reach matters, and choose the higher-rated or deeper-reviewed app when market trust is the constraint. Read both ranges rather than only the midpoint, then open the category hub and related collections to see whether this pair is an outlier or a normal category pattern.