QR Reader for iPhone vs GIF Keyboard
Revenue, downloads, ratings and category context for two iOS apps. Figures are estimates and should be read as ranges, not exact totals.
QR Reader for iPhoneTapMedia Ltd - Utilities
GIF KeyboardTenor - Utilities| Metric | QR Reader for iPhone | GIF Keyboard | Readout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated revenue / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | QR Reader for iPhone |
| Revenue band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Estimated downloads / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | QR Reader for iPhone |
| Download band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Rating | 4.71 | - | QR Reader for iPhone |
| Rating count | 1.4M | - | QR Reader for iPhone |
| Tracked keywords | 12 | — | QR Reader for iPhone |
| Category | Utilities | Utilities | Same market |
Which app is bigger?
QR Reader for iPhone and GIF Keyboard are compared inside Utilities with monthly revenue, downloads, rating, review volume, keyword footprint, category placement and range context. QR Reader for iPhone leads on monthly downloads in the current readout, and QR Reader for iPhone wins the revenue readout (the exact figures open with the paid plan), QR Reader for iPhone wins demand, QR Reader for iPhone has deeper review volume, and QR Reader for iPhone has the larger tracked keyword footprint. The better app depends on the job: choose the revenue leader when you need monetization proof, choose the download leader when reach matters, and choose the higher-rated or deeper-reviewed app when market trust is the constraint. Read both ranges rather than only the midpoint, then open the category hub and related collections to see whether this pair is an outlier or a normal category pattern.