QR Code Reader＊Barcode Scanner vs Google
Revenue, downloads, ratings and category context for two iOS apps. Figures are estimates and should be read as ranges, not exact totals.
QR Code Reader＊Barcode ScannerVISARGERD, S.L. - Utilities
GoogleGoogle - Utilities| Metric | QR Code Reader＊Barcode Scanner | Readout | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated revenue / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | QR Code Reader＊Barcode Scanner |
| Revenue band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Estimated downloads / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | |
| Download band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Rating | 4.47 | 4.65 | |
| Rating count | 22k | 4.9M | |
| Tracked keywords | 33 | 2 | QR Code Reader＊Barcode Scanner |
| Category | Utilities | Utilities | Same market |
Which app is bigger?
QR Code Reader＊Barcode Scanner and Google are compared inside Utilities with monthly revenue, downloads, rating, review volume, keyword footprint, category placement and range context. Google leads on monthly downloads in the current readout, and QR Code Reader＊Barcode Scanner wins the revenue readout (the exact figures open with the paid plan), Google wins demand, Google has deeper review volume, and QR Code Reader＊Barcode Scanner has the larger tracked keyword footprint. The better app depends on the job: choose the revenue leader when you need monetization proof, choose the download leader when reach matters, and choose the higher-rated or deeper-reviewed app when market trust is the constraint. Read both ranges rather than only the midpoint, then open the category hub and related collections to see whether this pair is an outlier or a normal category pattern.