Qibla Finder, Qibla Compass AR vs onX Hunt: GPS Hunting Maps
Revenue, downloads, ratings and category context for two iOS apps. Figures are estimates and should be read as ranges, not exact totals.
Qibla Finder, Qibla Compass ARBEKART TECH BILISIM TEKNOLOJI INSAAT TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI - Navigation
onX Hunt: GPS Hunting MapsonXmaps, Inc. - Navigation| Metric | Qibla Finder, Qibla Compass AR | onX Hunt: GPS Hunting Maps | Readout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated revenue / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | onX Hunt: GPS Hunting Maps |
| Revenue band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Estimated downloads / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | onX Hunt: GPS Hunting Maps |
| Download band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Rating | - | 4.89 | onX Hunt: GPS Hunting Maps |
| Rating count | - | 274k | onX Hunt: GPS Hunting Maps |
| Tracked keywords | — | — | Tie |
| Category | Navigation | Navigation | Same market |
Which app is bigger?
Qibla Finder, Qibla Compass AR and onX Hunt: GPS Hunting Maps are compared inside Navigation with monthly revenue, downloads, rating, review volume, keyword footprint, category placement and range context. onX Hunt: GPS Hunting Maps leads on monthly downloads in the current readout, and onX Hunt: GPS Hunting Maps wins the revenue readout (the exact figures open with the paid plan), onX Hunt: GPS Hunting Maps wins demand, onX Hunt: GPS Hunting Maps has deeper review volume, and Tie has the larger tracked keyword footprint. The better app depends on the job: choose the revenue leader when you need monetization proof, choose the download leader when reach matters, and choose the higher-rated or deeper-reviewed app when market trust is the constraint. Read both ranges rather than only the midpoint, then open the category hub and related collections to see whether this pair is an outlier or a normal category pattern.