Qibla Finder, Qibla Compass AR vs Google Maps
Revenue, downloads, ratings and category context for two iOS apps. Figures are estimates and should be read as ranges, not exact totals.
Qibla Finder, Qibla Compass ARBEKART TECH BILISIM TEKNOLOJI INSAAT TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI - Navigation
Google MapsGoogle - Navigation| Metric | Qibla Finder, Qibla Compass AR | Google Maps | Readout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated revenue / mo | $*** - opens with trial | ~$6k | Google Maps |
| Revenue band | $*** - opens with trial | $6k (point est.) | Use range + confidence |
| Estimated downloads / mo | $*** - opens with trial | ~9.0M | Google Maps |
| Download band | $*** - opens with trial | 9.0M (point est.) | Use range + confidence |
| Rating | - | 4.68 | Google Maps |
| Rating count | - | 7.3M | Google Maps |
| Tracked keywords | — | 5 | Google Maps |
| Category | Navigation | Navigation | Same market |
Which app is bigger?
Qibla Finder, Qibla Compass AR and Google Maps are compared inside Navigation with monthly revenue, downloads, rating, review volume, keyword footprint, category placement and range context. Google Maps leads on monthly downloads in the current readout, and Google Maps wins the revenue readout (the exact figures open with the paid plan), Google Maps wins demand, Google Maps has deeper review volume, and Google Maps has the larger tracked keyword footprint. The better app depends on the job: choose the revenue leader when you need monetization proof, choose the download leader when reach matters, and choose the higher-rated or deeper-reviewed app when market trust is the constraint. Read both ranges rather than only the midpoint, then open the category hub and related collections to see whether this pair is an outlier or a normal category pattern.