Proton VPN: Fast & Secure vs Shadowrocket
Revenue, downloads, ratings and category context for two iOS apps. Figures are estimates and should be read as ranges, not exact totals.
| Metric | Proton VPN: Fast & Secure | Shadowrocket | Readout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated revenue / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Proton VPN: Fast & Secure |
| Revenue band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Estimated downloads / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Proton VPN: Fast & Secure |
| Download band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Rating | 4.63 | 4.48 | Proton VPN: Fast & Secure |
| Rating count | 82k | 12k | Proton VPN: Fast & Secure |
| Tracked keywords | 5 | — | Proton VPN: Fast & Secure |
| Category | Utilities | Utilities | Same market |
Which app is bigger?
Proton VPN: Fast & Secure and Shadowrocket are compared inside Utilities with monthly revenue, downloads, rating, review volume, keyword footprint, category placement and range context. Proton VPN: Fast & Secure leads on monthly downloads in the current readout, and Proton VPN: Fast & Secure wins the revenue readout (the exact figures open with the paid plan), Proton VPN: Fast & Secure wins demand, Proton VPN: Fast & Secure has deeper review volume, and Proton VPN: Fast & Secure has the larger tracked keyword footprint. The better app depends on the job: choose the revenue leader when you need monetization proof, choose the download leader when reach matters, and choose the higher-rated or deeper-reviewed app when market trust is the constraint. Read both ranges rather than only the midpoint, then open the category hub and related collections to see whether this pair is an outlier or a normal category pattern.