Procreate Pocket vs Nomad Sculpt
Revenue, downloads, ratings and category context for two iOS apps. Figures are estimates and should be read as ranges, not exact totals.
Procreate PocketSavage Interactive Pty Ltd - Graphics & Design
Nomad SculptHexanomad - Graphics & Design| Metric | Procreate Pocket | Nomad Sculpt | Readout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated revenue / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Nomad Sculpt |
| Revenue band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Estimated downloads / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Procreate Pocket |
| Download band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Rating | 3.85 | 4.82 | Nomad Sculpt |
| Rating count | 13k | 13k | Nomad Sculpt |
| Tracked keywords | — | — | Tie |
| Category | Graphics & Design | Graphics & Design | Same market |
Which app is bigger?
Procreate Pocket and Nomad Sculpt are compared inside Graphics & Design with monthly revenue, downloads, rating, review volume, keyword footprint, category placement and range context. Procreate Pocket leads on monthly downloads in the current readout, and Nomad Sculpt wins the revenue readout (the exact figures open with the paid plan), Procreate Pocket wins demand, Nomad Sculpt has deeper review volume, and Tie has the larger tracked keyword footprint. The better app depends on the job: choose the revenue leader when you need monetization proof, choose the download leader when reach matters, and choose the higher-rated or deeper-reviewed app when market trust is the constraint. Read both ranges rather than only the midpoint, then open the category hub and related collections to see whether this pair is an outlier or a normal category pattern.