Pregnancy App. vs Monash FODMAP Diet
Revenue, downloads, ratings and category context for two iOS apps. Figures are estimates and should be read as ranges, not exact totals.
Pregnancy App.Amila Tech Limited - Medical
Monash FODMAP DietMonash University - Medical| Metric | Pregnancy App. | Monash FODMAP Diet | Readout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated revenue / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Monash FODMAP Diet |
| Revenue band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Estimated downloads / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Pregnancy App. |
| Download band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Rating | - | 4.23 | Monash FODMAP Diet |
| Rating count | - | 2.6k | Monash FODMAP Diet |
| Tracked keywords | 2 | — | Pregnancy App. |
| Category | Medical | Medical | Same market |
Which app is bigger?
Pregnancy App. and Monash FODMAP Diet are compared inside Medical with monthly revenue, downloads, rating, review volume, keyword footprint, category placement and range context. Pregnancy App. leads on monthly downloads in the current readout, and Monash FODMAP Diet wins the revenue readout (the exact figures open with the paid plan), Pregnancy App. wins demand, Monash FODMAP Diet has deeper review volume, and Pregnancy App. has the larger tracked keyword footprint. The better app depends on the job: choose the revenue leader when you need monetization proof, choose the download leader when reach matters, and choose the higher-rated or deeper-reviewed app when market trust is the constraint. Read both ranges rather than only the midpoint, then open the category hub and related collections to see whether this pair is an outlier or a normal category pattern.