Pocket GM 3: Football Sim vs Baseball GOAT
Revenue, downloads, ratings and category context for two iOS apps. Figures are estimates and should be read as ranges, not exact totals.
Pocket GM 3: Football SimJonathan Howell - Games
Baseball GOATRed falcon - Games| Metric | Pocket GM 3: Football Sim | Baseball GOAT | Readout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated revenue / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Partial signal |
| Revenue band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Estimated downloads / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Pocket GM 3: Football Sim |
| Download band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Rating | - | - | Tie |
| Rating count | - | - | Tie |
| Tracked keywords | — | — | Tie |
| Category | Games | Games | Same market |
Which app is bigger?
Pocket GM 3: Football Sim and Baseball GOAT are compared inside Games with monthly revenue, downloads, rating, review volume, keyword footprint, category placement and range context. Pocket GM 3: Football Sim leads on monthly downloads in the current readout, while a clean revenue readout is available only for Baseball GOAT in this pair. Pocket GM 3: Football Sim wins demand, Tie has deeper review volume, and Tie has the larger tracked keyword footprint. The better app depends on the job: choose the revenue leader when you need monetization proof, choose the download leader when reach matters, and choose the higher-rated or deeper-reviewed app when market trust is the constraint. Read both ranges rather than only the midpoint, then open the category hub and related collections to see whether this pair is an outlier or a normal category pattern.