Planet Fitness vs Map My Run GPS Running Tracker
Revenue, downloads, ratings and category context for two iOS apps. Figures are estimates and should be read as ranges, not exact totals.
| Metric | Planet Fitness | Map My Run GPS Running Tracker | Readout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated revenue / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Map My Run GPS Running Tracker |
| Revenue band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Estimated downloads / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Planet Fitness |
| Download band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Rating | 4.87 | 4.84 | Planet Fitness |
| Rating count | 753k | 747k | Planet Fitness |
| Tracked keywords | 5 | 5 | Tie |
| Category | Health & Fitness | Health & Fitness | Same market |
Which app is bigger?
Planet Fitness and Map My Run GPS Running Tracker are compared inside Health & Fitness with monthly revenue, downloads, rating, review volume, keyword footprint, category placement and range context. Planet Fitness leads on monthly downloads in the current readout, and Map My Run GPS Running Tracker wins the revenue readout (the exact figures open with the paid plan), Planet Fitness wins demand, Planet Fitness has deeper review volume, and Tie has the larger tracked keyword footprint. The better app depends on the job: choose the revenue leader when you need monetization proof, choose the download leader when reach matters, and choose the higher-rated or deeper-reviewed app when market trust is the constraint. Read both ranges rather than only the midpoint, then open the category hub and related collections to see whether this pair is an outlier or a normal category pattern.