piZap: Design & Edit Photos vs Procreate Pocket
Revenue, downloads, ratings and category context for two iOS apps. Figures are estimates and should be read as ranges, not exact totals.
piZap: Design & Edit PhotosDigital Palette LLC - Graphics & Design
Procreate PocketSavage Interactive Pty Ltd - Graphics & Design| Metric | piZap: Design & Edit Photos | Procreate Pocket | Readout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated revenue / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Procreate Pocket |
| Revenue band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Estimated downloads / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Procreate Pocket |
| Download band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Rating | - | 3.85 | Procreate Pocket |
| Rating count | - | 13k | Procreate Pocket |
| Tracked keywords | 2 | — | piZap: Design & Edit Photos |
| Category | Graphics & Design | Graphics & Design | Same market |
Which app is bigger?
piZap: Design & Edit Photos and Procreate Pocket are compared inside Graphics & Design with monthly revenue, downloads, rating, review volume, keyword footprint, category placement and range context. Procreate Pocket leads on monthly downloads in the current readout, and Procreate Pocket wins the revenue readout (the exact figures open with the paid plan), Procreate Pocket wins demand, Procreate Pocket has deeper review volume, and piZap: Design & Edit Photos has the larger tracked keyword footprint. The better app depends on the job: choose the revenue leader when you need monetization proof, choose the download leader when reach matters, and choose the higher-rated or deeper-reviewed app when market trust is the constraint. Read both ranges rather than only the midpoint, then open the category hub and related collections to see whether this pair is an outlier or a normal category pattern.