PETA: Saving Animals Made Easy vs Pinterest
Revenue, downloads, ratings and category context for two iOS apps. Figures are estimates and should be read as ranges, not exact totals.
PETA: Saving Animals Made EasyPeople for the Ethical Treatment of Animals - Lifestyle
PinterestPinterest, Inc. - Lifestyle| Metric | PETA: Saving Animals Made Easy | Readout | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated revenue / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Partial signal |
| Revenue band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Estimated downloads / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | |
| Download band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Rating | - | 4.78 | |
| Rating count | - | 5.7M | |
| Tracked keywords | — | 3 | |
| Category | Lifestyle | Lifestyle | Same market |
Which app is bigger?
PETA: Saving Animals Made Easy and Pinterest are compared inside Lifestyle with monthly revenue, downloads, rating, review volume, keyword footprint, category placement and range context. Pinterest leads on monthly downloads in the current readout, while a clean revenue readout is available only for Pinterest in this pair. Pinterest wins demand, Pinterest has deeper review volume, and Pinterest has the larger tracked keyword footprint. The better app depends on the job: choose the revenue leader when you need monetization proof, choose the download leader when reach matters, and choose the higher-rated or deeper-reviewed app when market trust is the constraint. Read both ranges rather than only the midpoint, then open the category hub and related collections to see whether this pair is an outlier or a normal category pattern.