Oopbuy-Shop China:Taobao,1688 vs FSD Hunter
Revenue, downloads, ratings and category context for two iOS apps. Figures are estimates and should be read as ranges, not exact totals.
Oopbuy-Shop China:Taobao,1688Openbuy开买科技 - Shopping
FSD HunterDavid Hugenberg - Shopping| Metric | Oopbuy-Shop China:Taobao,1688 | FSD Hunter | Readout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated revenue / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Tie |
| Revenue band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Estimated downloads / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Oopbuy-Shop China:Taobao,1688 |
| Download band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Rating | - | 4.33 | FSD Hunter |
| Rating count | - | 64 | FSD Hunter |
| Tracked keywords | — | — | Tie |
| Category | Shopping | Shopping | Same market |
Which app is bigger?
Oopbuy-Shop China:Taobao,1688 and FSD Hunter are compared inside Shopping with monthly revenue, downloads, rating, review volume, keyword footprint, category placement and range context. Oopbuy-Shop China:Taobao,1688 leads on monthly downloads in the current readout, and Tie wins the revenue readout (the exact figures open with the paid plan), Oopbuy-Shop China:Taobao,1688 wins demand, FSD Hunter has deeper review volume, and Tie has the larger tracked keyword footprint. The better app depends on the job: choose the revenue leader when you need monetization proof, choose the download leader when reach matters, and choose the higher-rated or deeper-reviewed app when market trust is the constraint. Read both ranges rather than only the midpoint, then open the category hub and related collections to see whether this pair is an outlier or a normal category pattern.