onX Offroad: Trail Maps & GPS vs MilGPS
Revenue, downloads, ratings and category context for two iOS apps. Figures are estimates and should be read as ranges, not exact totals.
| Metric | onX Offroad: Trail Maps & GPS | MilGPS | Readout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated revenue / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | onX Offroad: Trail Maps & GPS |
| Revenue band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Estimated downloads / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | onX Offroad: Trail Maps & GPS |
| Download band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Rating | 4.41 | 4.83 | MilGPS |
| Rating count | 9.2k | 5.5k | onX Offroad: Trail Maps & GPS |
| Tracked keywords | 1 | — | onX Offroad: Trail Maps & GPS |
| Category | Navigation | Navigation | Same market |
Which app is bigger?
onX Offroad: Trail Maps & GPS and MilGPS are compared inside Navigation with monthly revenue, downloads, rating, review volume, keyword footprint, category placement and range context. onX Offroad: Trail Maps & GPS leads on monthly downloads in the current readout, and onX Offroad: Trail Maps & GPS wins the revenue readout (the exact figures open with the paid plan), onX Offroad: Trail Maps & GPS wins demand, onX Offroad: Trail Maps & GPS has deeper review volume, and onX Offroad: Trail Maps & GPS has the larger tracked keyword footprint. The better app depends on the job: choose the revenue leader when you need monetization proof, choose the download leader when reach matters, and choose the higher-rated or deeper-reviewed app when market trust is the constraint. Read both ranges rather than only the midpoint, then open the category hub and related collections to see whether this pair is an outlier or a normal category pattern.