Omada - Make Sport Social vs WiMKiN Social Media
Revenue, downloads, ratings and category context for two iOS apps. Figures are estimates and should be read as ranges, not exact totals.
Omada - Make Sport Social - Social Networking
WiMKiN Social MediaJason Sheppard - Social Networking| Metric | Omada - Make Sport Social | WiMKiN Social Media | Readout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated revenue / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Partial signal |
| Revenue band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Estimated downloads / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | WiMKiN Social Media |
| Download band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Rating | - | - | Tie |
| Rating count | - | - | Tie |
| Tracked keywords | — | — | Tie |
| Category | Social Networking | Social Networking | Same market |
Which app is bigger?
Omada - Make Sport Social and WiMKiN Social Media are compared inside Social Networking with monthly revenue, downloads, rating, review volume, keyword footprint, category placement and range context. WiMKiN Social Media leads on monthly downloads in the current readout, while a clean revenue readout is available only for Omada - Make Sport Social in this pair. WiMKiN Social Media wins demand, Tie has deeper review volume, and Tie has the larger tracked keyword footprint. The better app depends on the job: choose the revenue leader when you need monetization proof, choose the download leader when reach matters, and choose the higher-rated or deeper-reviewed app when market trust is the constraint. Read both ranges rather than only the midpoint, then open the category hub and related collections to see whether this pair is an outlier or a normal category pattern.