NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals vs ReciMe: Recipes & Meal Planner
Revenue, downloads, ratings and category context for two iOS apps. Figures are estimates and should be read as ranges, not exact totals.
| Metric | NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals | ReciMe: Recipes & Meal Planner | Readout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated revenue / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | ReciMe: Recipes & Meal Planner |
| Revenue band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Estimated downloads / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | ReciMe: Recipes & Meal Planner |
| Download band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Rating | 4.91 | 4.80 | NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals |
| Rating count | 541k | 264k | NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals |
| Tracked keywords | 1 | 1 | Tie |
| Category | Food & Drink | Food & Drink | Same market |
Which app is bigger?
NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals and ReciMe: Recipes & Meal Planner are compared inside Food & Drink with monthly revenue, downloads, rating, review volume, keyword footprint, category placement and range context. ReciMe: Recipes & Meal Planner leads on monthly downloads in the current readout, and ReciMe: Recipes & Meal Planner wins the revenue readout (the exact figures open with the paid plan), ReciMe: Recipes & Meal Planner wins demand, NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals has deeper review volume, and Tie has the larger tracked keyword footprint. The better app depends on the job: choose the revenue leader when you need monetization proof, choose the download leader when reach matters, and choose the higher-rated or deeper-reviewed app when market trust is the constraint. Read both ranges rather than only the midpoint, then open the category hub and related collections to see whether this pair is an outlier or a normal category pattern.