NTE: Neverness to Everness vs Last Asylum: Plague
Revenue, downloads, ratings and category context for two iOS apps. Figures are estimates and should be read as ranges, not exact totals.
NTE: Neverness to EvernessN2E ENTERTAINMENT PTE. LTD. - Games
Last Asylum: PlagueWISENESS GAME ONLINE INTERNATIONAL LTD - Games| Metric | NTE: Neverness to Everness | Last Asylum: Plague | Readout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated revenue / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Tie |
| Revenue band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Estimated downloads / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Last Asylum: Plague |
| Download band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Rating | - | 4.80 | Last Asylum: Plague |
| Rating count | - | 30k | Last Asylum: Plague |
| Tracked keywords | — | — | Tie |
| Category | Games | Games | Same market |
Which app is bigger?
NTE: Neverness to Everness and Last Asylum: Plague are compared inside Games with monthly revenue, downloads, rating, review volume, keyword footprint, category placement and range context. Last Asylum: Plague leads on monthly downloads in the current readout, and Tie wins the revenue readout (the exact figures open with the paid plan), Last Asylum: Plague wins demand, Last Asylum: Plague has deeper review volume, and Tie has the larger tracked keyword footprint. The better app depends on the job: choose the revenue leader when you need monetization proof, choose the download leader when reach matters, and choose the higher-rated or deeper-reviewed app when market trust is the constraint. Read both ranges rather than only the midpoint, then open the category hub and related collections to see whether this pair is an outlier or a normal category pattern.