MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter vs Strava: Run, Bike, Walk
Revenue, downloads, ratings and category context for two iOS apps. Figures are estimates and should be read as ranges, not exact totals.
| Metric | MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter | Strava: Run, Bike, Walk | Readout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated revenue / mo | ~$12M | ~$16M | Strava: Run, Bike, Walk |
| Revenue band | $12M (point est.) | $16M (point est.) | Use range + confidence |
| Estimated downloads / mo | ~700k | ~3.0M | Strava: Run, Bike, Walk |
| Download band | 700k (point est.) | 3.0M (point est.) | Use range + confidence |
| Rating | 4.71 | 4.81 | Strava: Run, Bike, Walk |
| Rating count | 2.3M | 365k | MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter |
| Tracked keywords | 20 | 6 | MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter |
| Category | Health & Fitness | Health & Fitness | Same market |
Which app is bigger?
MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter and Strava: Run, Bike, Walk are compared inside Health & Fitness with monthly revenue, downloads, rating, review volume, keyword footprint, category placement and range context. MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter has about 700k monthly downloads and Strava: Run, Bike, Walk has about 3.0M, while revenue readouts are $12M and $16M. Strava: Run, Bike, Walk wins the revenue readout, Strava: Run, Bike, Walk wins demand, MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter has deeper review volume, and MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter has the larger tracked keyword footprint. The better app depends on the job: choose the revenue leader when you need monetization proof, choose the download leader when reach matters, and choose the higher-rated or deeper-reviewed app when market trust is the constraint. Read both ranges rather than only the midpoint, then open the category hub and related collections to see whether this pair is an outlier or a normal category pattern.