MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter vs Planet Fitness
Revenue, downloads, ratings and category context for two iOS apps. Figures are estimates and should be read as ranges, not exact totals.
MyFitnessPal: Calorie CounterMyFitnessPal, Inc. - Health & Fitness
Planet FitnessPlanet Fitness Holdings, LLC - Health & Fitness| Metric | MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter | Planet Fitness | Readout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated revenue / mo | ~$12M | $*** - opens with trial | MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter |
| Revenue band | $12M (point est.) | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Estimated downloads / mo | ~700k | $*** - opens with trial | Planet Fitness |
| Download band | 700k (point est.) | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Rating | 4.71 | 4.87 | Planet Fitness |
| Rating count | 2.3M | 753k | MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter |
| Tracked keywords | 19 | 3 | MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter |
| Category | Health & Fitness | Health & Fitness | Same market |
Which app is bigger?
MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter and Planet Fitness are compared inside Health & Fitness with monthly revenue, downloads, rating, review volume, keyword footprint, category placement and range context. Planet Fitness leads on monthly downloads in the current readout, and MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter wins the revenue readout (the exact figures open with the paid plan), Planet Fitness wins demand, MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter has deeper review volume, and MyFitnessPal: Calorie Counter has the larger tracked keyword footprint. The better app depends on the job: choose the revenue leader when you need monetization proof, choose the download leader when reach matters, and choose the higher-rated or deeper-reviewed app when market trust is the constraint. Read both ranges rather than only the midpoint, then open the category hub and related collections to see whether this pair is an outlier or a normal category pattern.