Microsoft OneNote vs Freenotes®: AI Notes Taking
Revenue, downloads, ratings and category context for two iOS apps. Figures are estimates and should be read as ranges, not exact totals.
Microsoft OneNoteMicrosoft Corporation - Productivity
Freenotes®: AI Notes Taking - Productivity| Metric | Microsoft OneNote | Freenotes®: AI Notes Taking | Readout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated revenue / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Freenotes®: AI Notes Taking |
| Revenue band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Estimated downloads / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Microsoft OneNote |
| Download band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Rating | - | - | Tie |
| Rating count | - | - | Tie |
| Tracked keywords | 6 | — | Microsoft OneNote |
| Category | Productivity | Productivity | Same market |
Which app is bigger?
Microsoft OneNote and Freenotes®: AI Notes Taking are compared inside Productivity with monthly revenue, downloads, rating, review volume, keyword footprint, category placement and range context. Microsoft OneNote leads on monthly downloads in the current readout, and Freenotes®: AI Notes Taking wins the revenue readout (the exact figures open with the paid plan), Microsoft OneNote wins demand, Tie has deeper review volume, and Microsoft OneNote has the larger tracked keyword footprint. The better app depends on the job: choose the revenue leader when you need monetization proof, choose the download leader when reach matters, and choose the higher-rated or deeper-reviewed app when market trust is the constraint. Read both ranges rather than only the midpoint, then open the category hub and related collections to see whether this pair is an outlier or a normal category pattern.