Microsoft Copilot vs Things 3
Revenue, downloads, ratings and category context for two iOS apps. Figures are estimates and should be read as ranges, not exact totals.
Microsoft CopilotMicrosoft Corporation - Productivity
Things 3Cultured Code GmbH & Co. KG - Productivity| Metric | Microsoft Copilot | Things 3 | Readout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated revenue / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Microsoft Copilot |
| Revenue band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Estimated downloads / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Microsoft Copilot |
| Download band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Rating | 4.84 | 4.82 | Microsoft Copilot |
| Rating count | 405k | 28k | Microsoft Copilot |
| Tracked keywords | 3 | — | Microsoft Copilot |
| Category | Productivity | Productivity | Same market |
Which app is bigger?
Microsoft Copilot and Things 3 are compared inside Productivity with monthly revenue, downloads, rating, review volume, keyword footprint, category placement and range context. Microsoft Copilot leads on monthly downloads in the current readout, and Microsoft Copilot wins the revenue readout (the exact figures open with the paid plan), Microsoft Copilot wins demand, Microsoft Copilot has deeper review volume, and Microsoft Copilot has the larger tracked keyword footprint. The better app depends on the job: choose the revenue leader when you need monetization proof, choose the download leader when reach matters, and choose the higher-rated or deeper-reviewed app when market trust is the constraint. Read both ranges rather than only the midpoint, then open the category hub and related collections to see whether this pair is an outlier or a normal category pattern.