MapXplorer: GPS Navigation vs MilGPS
Revenue, downloads, ratings and category context for two iOS apps. Figures are estimates and should be read as ranges, not exact totals.
MapXplorer: GPS NavigationGoldlab Applications Yazilim Bilişim Anonim Şirketi - Navigation
MilGPSCascode Labs Pty Ltd - Navigation| Metric | MapXplorer: GPS Navigation | MilGPS | Readout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated revenue / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | MapXplorer: GPS Navigation |
| Revenue band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Estimated downloads / mo | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | MapXplorer: GPS Navigation |
| Download band | $*** - opens with trial | $*** - opens with trial | Use range + confidence |
| Rating | 4.53 | 4.83 | MilGPS |
| Rating count | 32k | 5.5k | MapXplorer: GPS Navigation |
| Tracked keywords | 3 | — | MapXplorer: GPS Navigation |
| Category | Navigation | Navigation | Same market |
Which app is bigger?
MapXplorer: GPS Navigation and MilGPS are compared inside Navigation with monthly revenue, downloads, rating, review volume, keyword footprint, category placement and range context. MapXplorer: GPS Navigation leads on monthly downloads in the current readout, and MapXplorer: GPS Navigation wins the revenue readout (the exact figures open with the paid plan), MapXplorer: GPS Navigation wins demand, MapXplorer: GPS Navigation has deeper review volume, and MapXplorer: GPS Navigation has the larger tracked keyword footprint. The better app depends on the job: choose the revenue leader when you need monetization proof, choose the download leader when reach matters, and choose the higher-rated or deeper-reviewed app when market trust is the constraint. Read both ranges rather than only the midpoint, then open the category hub and related collections to see whether this pair is an outlier or a normal category pattern.